The Great Chicago Rail Loop - Why It's Needed

Executive Offers $8 Billion Remedy for Midwest Rail Logjam


A software industry veteran is taking on one of the toughest problems facing the U.S. railroad industry: the chronic traffic bottleneck surrounding Chicago that can take more than a day for freight trains to move through.

Frank Patton, 73 years old and chairman of fledgling Great Lakes Basin Transportation Inc., wants to build a privately-financed rail route through Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana that would allow trains to loop around the congested rail hub.

Mr. Patton’s proposed 280-mile line would reduce the about 30-hour train travel times through Chicago to eight or 10 hours. It would take about five years to permit and build and cost $8 billion, he said, monies that eventually would be paid off by user fees from the six major North American railroads the line intends to serve.

Its hurdles are many. Great Lakes Basin Transportation still has to assemble financing and obtain regulatory and environmental approvals. And the plan faces opposition from affected landowners and a so-far cool reception from railroads, which are pushing their own plan to dislodge the Chicago rail logjam.

But Mr. Patton is undaunted. “Anybody who looks at the projections for a 60% increase in traffic by 2040, they know something has to happen,” he said. “The Chicago terminal is one snowstorm away from disaster.” He is moving quickly to get regulators’ approval and to line up financing.
Comment: Great Lakes Basin Transportation Inc. See The Chicago Railroad bottleneck:
Shippers complain that a load of freight can make its way from Los Angeles to Chicago in 48 hours, then take 30 hours to travel across the city. A recent trainload of sulfur took some 27 hours to pass through Chicago — an average speed of 1.13 miles per hour, or about a quarter the pace of many electric wheelchairs.


1 comment:

  1. He needs to rethink his railroad politics. He's ignoring the Wisconsin side, and is more or less uniting the BNSF lines, which already come together in western Illinois, with the CSX system.

    Now is the delay because of Metra and clots in Chicago, or is it because of rivalry and problems integrating the two biggest railroads of the country? It also appears that the lion's share of the expense would be borne by CSX, judging by the map of rail lines.

    Another big issue; the railroads would more or less need to abandon rail yards they've been using for 150 years, and then the EPA would swoop in and tell them they need to clean every bit of fuel oil and creosote down to bedrock.


Any anonymous comments with links will be rejected. Please do not comment off-topic