4.15.2010

Explaining V.A.T. (Value Added Tax)

Europe's VAT Lessons: Rates start low and increase, while income tax rates stay high.

Excerpts:

A VAT is essentially a national sales tax that is assessed at each stage of production, with the bill passed along to consumers at the cash register. In Europe the average rate is a little under 20%. In the U.S., a federal VAT would presumably be levied on top of state and local sales taxes that range as high as 10%. Some nations also exempt food, medicine and certain other goods from the tax.

VATs were sold in Europe as a way to tax consumption, which in principle does less economic harm than taxing income, savings or investment. This sounds good, but in practice the VAT has rarely replaced the income tax, or even resulted in a lower income-tax rate.

...

In the U.S., VAT proponents aren't calling for a repeal of the 16th Amendment that allowed the income tax—and, in fact, they want income tax rates to rise. The White House has promised to let the top individual rate increase in January to 39.6% from 35% as the Bush tax cuts expire, while the dividend rate will go to 39.6% from 15% and the capital gains rate to 20% next year and 23.8% in 2013 under the health bill, from 15% today. Even with these higher rates, or because of them, revenues won't come close to paying for the Obama Administration's new spending—which is why it is also eyeing a VAT.

One trait of European VATs is that while their rates often start low, they rarely stay that way. Of the 10 major OECD nations with VATs or national sales taxes, only Canada has lowered its rate. Denmark has gone to 25% from 9%, Germany to 19% from 10%, and Italy to 20% from 12%. The nonpartisan Tax Foundation recently calculated that to balance the U.S. federal budget with a VAT would require a rate of at least 18%.

Proponents also argue that a VAT would result in less federal government borrowing. But that, too, has rarely been true in Europe. From the 1980s through 2005, deficits were by and large higher in Europe than in the U.S. By 2005, debt averaged 50% of GDP in Europe, according to OECD data, compared to under 40% in the U.S.


Comment: Back in college (I majored in economics and finance), my econ profs were agog over the V.A.T. But they saw it as a replacement to the income tax. Current thought is that it would be in addition to! My view is that taxing consumption instead of income would be better for our nation (Thought: it would spur investment!).

1 comment:

  1. VAT: as if companies don't have enough to do complying with our tax code already, let's tax on the value of everything leaving the plant......there is simply no polite way of describing how asinine this idea is.

    I'm with you, Jim, on a real consumption tax.....maybe we could start with "taxes, duties, imposts, and excises" and dispense with direct taxes like the VAT and income tax....cost of compliance and evasion is over half a trillion dollars annually already, so we could give a tremendous boost to the economy simply by simplifying our tax structure, even before cutting taxes.

    ReplyDelete

Any anonymous comments with links will be rejected. Please do not comment off-topic