6.04.2008

The end of the SUV?

G.M. Shifts Focus to Small Cars in Sign of Sport Utility Demise

Excerpts:

And in a humbling admission that the S.U.V. era is all but over, G.M., Detroit’s leading automaker, said it was considering selling the gas-guzzling Hummer brand it once regarded as a pillar of future growth.

In announcing the changes, Mr. Wagoner said $4-a-gallon gas prices had forced a “structural shift” by American consumers away from large vehicles into more fuel-efficient cars.

“These prices are changing consumer behavior and changing it rapidly,” Mr. Wagoner said before G.M.’s annual meeting in Wilmington, Del. “We don’t believe it’s a spike or a temporary shift. We believe it is permanent.”
...

But the day of reckoning for the full-size S.U.V. and its 14-miles-per-gallon fuel consumption has been coming for some time.

“At the peak in 2002, G.M. sold 600,000 full-size S.U.V.’s, but they’re on pace this year to sell less than 250,000 of them,” said David Healy, an analyst with Burnham Securities. “And the nails in the coffin are getting screwed down a little tighter.”

Big Vehicles Stagger Under the Weight of $4 Gas

Excerpt:

With help from Jake Fisher, a senior automotive engineer at the Consumer Reports test track in Connecticut, I crunched some numbers this week to see how much more expensive these big vehicles had become. The answer is pretty simple: a lot more expensive.

While the F-250 costs $100,000 and a fully loaded F-150 — the better-known, smaller Ford pickup — costs about $70,000, a Ford Focus still costs less than $40,000 over five years. A Honda Civic Hybrid does, too. A Toyota Prius costs only a little more. A Subaru Outback station wagon runs $50,000 or so.

To put this in perspective, the difference between a Focus and an F-250 over five years is $60,000. The annual pretax income of a typical family in this country is also about $60,000. So choosing a F-250 over a Focus is like volunteering for a 20 percent pay cut. The relative resale values might cushion the blow a little, but not much.

That’s why more people are deciding that towing capacity and the other benefits of pickup trucks and S.U.V.’s are not worth the costs. The F-250 may still make sense for some business owners. But, as Mr. Fisher says, on those few occasions when the rest of us need to move some horses, we can rent a truck. “The new economics of car buying is, ‘Don’t overbuy,’ ” he told me. “Buy something you’re going to need most of the time.”



Comment: The end of the SUV? I hope so! (4 years ago I almost bought one. Gas was on the verge of $ 3.00 per gallon. We bought an Impala instead).

5 comments:

  1. Well, I'm going to have to guess that the Suburban and lesser SUVs are going to be more of a niche vehicle, that's for sure. And it's worth noting that minivans and "crossovers" are starting to tow more than 2 tons.

    Just like the Buick Roadmaster could back in 1996, and it got better mileage with a small block V8 than minivans do today with a V6.

    Bring back the Roadmaster!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Has anyone here ever tried any of those gas gimmicks? You know, the "Tornado" (device that supposedly gives a more efficient fuel/air mixture)and similar items? I'd like to hear if you've had any success with anything.

    I once tried some fancy spark plug wires and I think they might have actually worked to give my car better gas mileage. I say "think" because before I installed them I didn't keep good records to do a before and after comparative analysis. But I know that if anything, they didn't hurt anything.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anon, don'cha think that if there was a gimmick that would give you even 10% better mileage without damaging the engine, somebody would have made it standard by now? We've only had hysteria about gas prices for the past 35 years, after all.

    ReplyDelete
  4. BB, for the most part I do think you're correct. The market does run itself and if there were really a device that worked, everyone would know about it. I got some fancy spark plug wires from some little known company where the spark had a stronger arc and was more efficient and therefore delivered better fuel economy. Or at least that's what they advertised. Maybe this company actually had a good product and the small fuel economy savings it added to your driving was not enough for the market to take much notice.

    I just wish I would have kept better records at the time to see if they actually worked or not. I put them on a car before I had taken good records of the old spark plugs. The only thing I know for sure is that they didn't hurt the fuel mileage at all. It seems like I got 3-4 mpg better than what was specified by leading auto ratings at the time for that car.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was hoping we'd have some interesting stories of people telling us the devices they've used to save gas. This must mean that either they don't work and thus the lack of responses, or JP needs to expand his website beyond the 3 regular readers. :)

    ReplyDelete

Any anonymous comments with links will be rejected. Please do not comment off-topic