Showing posts with label Theology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theology. Show all posts

3.17.2010

Absolutes Convictions Opinions and Questions



Comment: From ESV Study Bible "True Theology: Knowing and Loving God"

Excerpt:

Where an issue falls within these categories should be determined by weighing the cumulative force of at least seven considerations:


  1. biblical clarity
  2. relevance to the character of God
  3. relevance to the essence of the gospel
  4. biblical frequency and significance (how often in Scripture it is taught, and what weight Scripture places upon it)
  5. effect on other doctrines
  6. consensus among Christians (past and present) and
  7. effect on personal and church life
These criteria for determining the importance of particular beliefs must be considered in light of their cumulative weight regarding the doctrine being considered. For instance, just the fact that a doctrine may go against the general consensus among believers (see item 6) does not necessarily mean it is wrong, although that might add some weight to the argument against it. All the categories should be considered collectively in determining how important an issue is to the Christian faith. The ability to rightly discern the difference between core doctrines and legitimately disputable matters will keep the church from either compromising important truth or needlessly dividing over peripheral issues.

11.11.2008

A Primer on Hyper-Calvinism

A Primer on Hyper-Calvinism

JP: Good read by Phil Johnson.

Introduction:

I wrote and posted this article because I am concerned about some subtle trends that seem to signal a rising tide of hyper-Calvinism, especially within the ranks of young Calvinists and the newly Reformed. I have seen these trends in numerous Reformed theological forums on the Internet, including mailing lists, Web sites, and Usenet forums.

Lest anyone wonder where my own convictions lie, I am a Calvinist. I am a five-point Calvinist, affirming without reservation the Canons of the Synod of Dordt. And when I speak of hyper-Calvinism, I am not using the term as a careless pejorative. I'm not an Arminian who labels all Calvinism "hyper." When I employ the term, I am using it in its historical sense.

History teaches us that hyper-Calvinism is as much a threat to true Calvinism as Arminianism is. Virtually every revival of true Calvinism since the Puritan era has been hijacked, crippled, or ultimately killed by hyper-Calvinist influences. Modern Calvinists would do well to be on guard against the influence of these deadly trends.

10.03.2008

Church marqee fight












HT: Sandalstraps' Sanctuary

Comment: I labeled this "humor" as it looks photoshopped to me!

3.06.2008

This will cheer you up!

“seated us with him in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 2:6)

Comment: To my readers. I take a break today from bleak economic news (gasoline prices, inflation, housing crisis, sinking dollar, etc) with the above link. Links over to a Charles Hodge quote that will cheer the heart of every believer!

11.22.2007

Thanksgiving Cogitations

What was "Reformed" in the Reformation? If one wants to know what the Protestant Reformation was all about without reading huge volumes of historical literature, it is perhaps most clarifying to look at the theological results. One should specifically note the rediscovery of five critical biblical doctrines that had been obscured from public view by the medieval version of what we now know as the Roman Catholic Church. And just so you know, Rome still either openly opposes or seriously distorts these doctrines. Using the Latin names given to each, they are:


Sola Scriptura (Scripture alone): The Reformers were united in their belief that the Bible alone teaches all that is necessary for salvation and Christian living (cf. 2 Peter 1:1-4). They held the Word of God to be the only standard by which men's consciences may be bound. Rome, on the other hand, then and now, denies sola Scriptura by elevating Papal decrees and church tradition to what they say are equal (but are in reality greater) positions of authority than that of the Bible. Where the meaning of the Bible differs from the opinion of the Pope or official doctrine (as is very often the case) the Word of God plays a mute second fiddle.


Sola Gratia (by Grace alone): The reformers understood that salvation is not a cooperative event carried out by God and man working in partnership. In salvation, sinners are rescued from God's wrath by His grace alone (cf. Titus 3:3-7). God's grace is His spontaneous and unmerited favor, granted to the spiritually dead and helpless sinner through the regenerating work of the Holy Spirit. God mercifully releases those whom He is saving from their own willful bondage to sin and thus enables them to repent and believe (cf. John 3:3; 6:44; Rom. 8:6-8; 9:16). Interestingly, this point of doctrine is disputed today, not only by Rome, but also by many evangelicals.


Sola Fide (through Faith alone): "Justified" is the biblical term that describes a person as forgiven, not guilty, and perfectly righteous in God's sight. According to Scripture, justification is bestowed on the sinner by grace alone through faith alone, "not as a result of works, so that no one may boast" (Eph. 2:8-9; cf. Gal 2:16). According to official Roman Catholic dogma, however, using the word "alone" after the word "faith" will earn you a pronouncement of anathema (formal damnation). Rome actually forbids you to believe or repeat what the Bible plainly states! They insist that while justification begins with faith, it can only be completed through the sinner's personal effort. In Roman Catholic theology, one may not say, "Therefore, having been justified by faith," or "having now been justified by His blood" (the exact words of Paul in Romans 5:1 and 5:9, emphasis added). According to Rome, one may only believe that he is being justified - by faith plus works.


Solus Christus (because of Christ alone): The reformers understood that the salvation of God's people was the work of Jesus Christ alone. His death was a sufficient and effective sacrifice for sin (cf. Heb. 9:12, 26, 28; 10:12, 14). He is the only mediator between God and men (cf. 1 Timothy 2:5). Only Christ's righteousness (not the sinner's personal righteousness) merits the believing sinner's justification (2 Cor. 5:21). Rome, on the other hand, commands the performance of seven essential works of merit (sacraments) for justification. Rome also insists that Mary (not Jesus) is the dispenser of grace. While Rome denies that Christ's righteousness may be imputed to the believing sinner, Mary is said to have vast amounts of excess righteousness which can be imputed to sinners. This form of blasphemy against the Son of God is bad enough, but it culminates in blasphemy against God the Father - the idolatry of Mary worship. Mary is praised as the "co-redemptress" and "co-mediatrix" with Christ. Rome even refers to her in some places as the savior of mankind, the one who commands God to save whom she will.


Soli Deo Gloria (for the glory of God alone): It is obvious that in Roman Catholic theology Mary receives equal (if not greater) credit than God for the salvation of sinners. Rome openly glorifies her. Also, God is robbed of His glory by making the sinner the one who ultimately performs (via the sacraments) or suffers (via Purgatory) his own way into heaven. But the Bible insists, and the reformers recognized, that God saves sinners by Himself. Therefore He alone should receive all praise and glory. And the God of the Bible is a jealous God (cf. Ex. 20:5). He will not share His glory with another (cf. Isaiah 42:8; 48:11).


So what was reformed (or recovered) during the Protestant Reformation? In the final analysis, it was the gospel of God's grace. And the "church" that stole the gospel the first time will gladly do so again if Christians everywhere do not take seriously the command to "contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints" (Jude 3). -- Copyright © 2006 Daryl Wingerd. Permission granted for reproduction in exact form.


Comment: Cogitations include items written by others, shared because of the importance of the content in my judgment, usually something I wish I had said myself but most likely would not express as well.

** Sola scriptura; sola gratia; sola fide; solus Christus; soli Deus gloria; only Jesus saves. Email author-editor Dr. Warren Vanhetloo to begin subscription, ask questions, make comments, or request removal, at cbsvan[AT]sbcglobal[DOT]net

9.29.2007

Gilbert Keith Chesterton on "Humility"

What we suffer from today is humility in the wrong place. Modesty has moved from the organ of ambition ... [and] settled upon the organ of conviction, where it was never meant to be. A man was meant to be doubtful about himself, but undoubting about the truth; this has been exactly reversed. We are on the road to producing a race of men too mentally modest to believe in the multiplication table.

From Orthodoxy, Gilbert Keith Chesterton, pp 31-32.

Cited by D.A. Carson in Becoming Conversant with the Emerging Church: Understanding a Movement and Its Implications, p. 217

9.28.2007

God’s Absolute Sovereignty

John MacArthur: God’s Absolute Sovereignty

Intro:

No doctrine is more despised by the natural mind than the truth that God is absolutely sovereign. Human pride loathes the suggestion that God orders everything, controls everything, rules over everything. The carnal mind, burning with enmity against God, abhors the biblical teaching that nothing comes to pass except according to His eternal decrees. Most of all, the flesh hates the notion that salvation is entirely God’s work. If God chose who would be saved, and if His choice was settled before the foundation of the world, then believers deserve no credit for any aspect of their salvation.

But that is, after all, precisely what Scripture teaches. Even faith is God’s gracious gift to His elect. Jesus said, “No one can come to Me, unless it has been granted him from the Father” (John 6:65). “Nor does anyone know the Father, except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wills to reveal Him” (Matt. 11:27). Therefore no one who is saved has anything to boast about (cf Eph. 2:8, 9). “Salvation is from the Lord” (Jonah 2:9).

The doctrine of divine election is explicitly taught throughout Scripture. For example, in the New Testament epistles alone, we learn that all believers are “chosen of God” (Titus 1:1). We were “predestined according to His purpose who works all things after the counsel of His will” (Eph. 1:11, emphasis added). “He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world . . . He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the kind intention of His will” (vv. 4, 5). We “are called according to His purpose. For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son . . . and whom He predestined, these He also called; and whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified” (Rom. 8:28–30).


Comment: The encouraging message of the day! I trust you will read!

8.23.2007

Job's "friends" by Walter C. Kaiser, Jr


Walter C. Kaiser, Jr



Reductionist Justice: Where Job's friends went wrong about suffering

Excerpt (be sure to read the entire article!):

Where then did Job's three friends go wrong? They reduced all evil to "retributive suffering," which is caused by sin and disobedience to God. But there are seven other types of suffering mentioned in the Bible: educational or disciplinary suffering as in Proverbs 3:11 or Hebrews 12:5-6; vicarious suffering, as in the case of our Lord's death on the cross; empathetic suffering, where one person's grief affects many others, as Isaiah 63:9 illustrates; evidential or testimonial suffering, as in the first two chapters of Job; doxological suffering for the glory of God, as in the man born blind in John 9; revelational suffering, as in the case of the prophet Hosea's wife abandoning him; and apocalyptic or eschatological suffering that will come at the end of this age.


Comment: Excellent read! Image from Gordon Conwell Seminary

8.07.2007

Is God all powerful and all sovereign - or not?

John Piper: Response to Rabbi Kushner

Rabbi Kushner is the author of:



Intro:

From 11 to 12 this morning, Gary Eichten of Minnesota Public Radio interviewed Rabbi Harold Kushner about the collapse of the 35W bridge. Kushner is best known for his book When Bad Things Happen to Good People. There were several astonishing things about this interview—not unusual for religious talk shows on public radio, but astonishing still.

Read the full article here.

Comment: God is all powerful! And He is sovereign! Ephesians 1:11 (NIV): "[God] works out everything in conformity with the purpose of his will"

8.02.2007

I thought this was funny


(In a pointed way!)

Book titles for which I'm still waiting

101 Years of Charismaticism: An Anthology of Achievement, including the chapter titles—




  1. "Documented Fulfilled Prophecies"

  2. "Century of Tongues Transcribed, Taxonomized, and Translated"

  3. "How the Holy Spirit Changed His Mind About Women Pastors"

  4. "A Century of New Revelation Recorded"

  5. "From Your Own Number: False Teachers the Movement Has Discredited and Excommunicated"

  6. "Positive, Biblical, Lasting Contributions Thanks Solely to Charismatic Distinctives"

  7. "Sola Scriptura, Schmola Scriptura: Getting Past the Reformation"

  8. "Five Times Is Never Enough: Spirit-Led Chorus Singing"

  9. "Essential Truths the Bible Left Out"



I would add this chapter title:

"Onto the Mission Field - Why waste time with language studies"


Can you "Name the Charismatics?"

7.10.2007

Verses: Total Depravity (Total Inability)

Total Depravity (Total Inability)

Comment: A healthy reminder that being "dead in trespasses and sins" (Ephesians 2:1), the only way to be saved is "by grace"! (Ephesians 2:8-9, "For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.")

6.28.2007

Hyper-Calvinism defined


Challies: Hyper-Calvinism: A Brief Definition

Comment: a good read. I've regarded hyper-Calvinism as the teaching that precludes evangelism. This is basically the sum of what Phil Johnson states.

Read the full article. As for me, I'm a TULIP guy. But I don't believe in double predestination and I believe in heralding the gospel to all.

6.21.2007

Ten Reasons We Believe the Bible

Ten Reasons We Believe the Bible

Comment: Good read from the Pulpit Magazine

6.15.2007

"the golden chain"




Benjamin B. Warfield on Election

Excerpt:

Read Rom. viii. 29, 30, and see "the golden chain" which, as a fine old divine, John Arrowsmith, puts it, "God lets down from heaven that by it he may draw up his elect thither." "For whom he foreknew"--that is election, the setting upon his people with distinguishing preoccupation and love, according to the pregnant use of "know" in such a passage say, as Amos iii. 2, "You only have I known out of all the families of the earth" --"for whom he foreknew, he also foreordained to be conformed to the image of his Son"-this is the high destiny prepared for us!--"that he might be the firstborn among many brethren: and whom he foreordained, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified." Count these five golden links, all acts of God's own, working our salvation, and note how they are welded together in one unbreakable chain, so that all who are set upon in God's gracious distinguishing view are carried on by his grace, step by step, up to the great consummation of that glorification which realizes the promised conformity to the image of God's own Son. It is "election," you see, that does all this; for "whom he foreknew, . . . them he also glorified." That fine old divine to whom we have just referred tells us further that "election, having once pitched upon a man, will find him out and call him home, wherever he be. Zacchaeus out of cursed Jericho; Abraham out of idolatrous Ur of the Chaldeans; Nicodemus and Paul out of the college of the Pharisees, Christ's sworn enemies; Dionysius and Damaris, out of superstitious Athens. In whatever dunghill God's jewels be hid, election will both find them out there and fetch them out from thence." "Rejoice," our Savior cried (Luke x. 20), "rejoice in this- that your names are written in heaven," in, that is, the Lamb's book of life (Rev. xxi. 27), which the same fine old divine counsels us always to remember, is "a book of love-the writing of our names in which is the firstborn of all God's favors."


Romans 8:29-30 "For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified."

The Golden Chain:


  1. "For whom he foreknew" - Election
  2. "he also foreordained to be conformed to the image of his Son" - Our destiny
  3. "whom he foreordained, them he also called" - Effectual calling
  4. "and whom he called, them he also justified" - Justification
  5. "and whom he justified, them he also glorified." - Glorification


Comment: A good read.

6.02.2007

Saturday's Happenings



Picture of poppy from front yard on 6/2



Scripture associated with Hodge reading which follows:

  1. Genesis 3
  2. Adam in Pauline Epistles





The Effects of the First Sin

The effects of sin upon our first parents themselves, were:

  1. Shame, a sense of degradation and pollution.
  2. Dread of the displeasure of God; or, a sense of guilt, and the consequent desire to hide from his presence.

These effects were unavoidable. They prove the loss not only of innocence but of original righteousness, and with it of the favour and fellowship of God. The state therefore to which Adam was reduced by his disobedience, so far as his subjective condition is concerned, was analogous to that of the fallen angels. He was entirely and absolutely ruined. It is said that no man becomes thoroughly depraved by one transgression. In one sense this is true. But one transgression by incurring the wrath and curse of God and the loss of fellowship with Him, as effectually involves spiritual death, as one perforation of the heart causes the death of the body; or one puncture of the eyes involves us in perpetual darkness. The other forms of evil consequent on Adam's disobedience were merely subordinate. They were but the expressions of the divine displeasure and the consequences of that spiritual death in which the threatened penalty essentially consisted.

Hodge v 2 p 129



  1. Rachel called from the Rhine Region. She only had 1 minute left on her phone card and it her call was exactly 65 seconds long so there was not much news other than to here she is OK. Tomorrow the tour goes onto to Amsterdam from which she leaves on Wednesday
  2. I had a myriad (not really that many I suppose) of small errands. I dropped my Filson boots off at John's shoe repair on Winnetka.
  3. I Fueled both vehicles and my tractor. I actually mowed first thing and ran out of gas in Mrs. Finke's yard ... the tractor sputtered but I was just able to make it back to the garage when it died.
  4. Brother came by and we played 9 ball. I beat him 6 games to 3. On Memorial Day he won 6 to 5.
  5. I went up to Verizon in Maple Grove and they transferred my contacts from my old to the new phone (free!)
  6. Roger is making dinner tonight ... lamb kabobs. Should be good
  7. Worship tomorrow at 4th



Important verses from tonight's reading:

  1. 1 Samuel 15:22, "Has the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, As in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, And to heed than the fat of rams
  2. 1 Samuel 15:23, "For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, And stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry."
  3. 1 Samuel 16:7, "Do not look at his appearance or at his physical stature, because I have refused him. For the LORD does not see as man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart"


Worthwhile to read both chapters for the context!

5.30.2007

Hindering the culture of criticism

The Problem of the Critic

Conclusion:

I would like to propose a series of guiding principles that should hinder this growth of a culture of criticism:


  1. Critique as a friend: Treat every enemy as a friend (Luke 6:35).
  2. Critique yourself first: Identify how you manifest the same problem (Luke 6:41-42).
  3. Critique with care: Let the verbiage you use be peaceable, gentle, merciful, and without partiality (James 3:17).
  4. Critique proactively: Avoid the quarrels, and teach patiently with love; keep self-interest and pride as far out of the picture as possible (2 Timothy 2:24-26).


Comment: Good article by Thomas Pryde, Pastor of Berean Baptist Church in Fremont, California.

5.24.2007

The Nature of the Temptation

One of a set of Medici tapestries on the Genesis story of Adam and Eve, from the Academia, Florence. The representation of the garden invites comparison with Milton, as does the portrayal of two key dramatic moments: Eve tempted by the serpent, and Eve offering the fruit to Adam. Su concessione del Ministero per i Beni Culturali e Ambientali.

The first address of the tempter to Eve was designed to awaken distrust in the goodness of God, and doubt as to the truth of the prohibition. “Hath God indeed said, ye shall net eat of every tree of the garden?” or, rather, as the words probably mean, “Has God said, ye shall not eat of any tree of the garden?” The next address was a direct assault upon her faith. “Ye shall not surely die;” but on the contrary, become as God himself in knowledge. To this temptation she yielded, and Adam joined in the transgression. From this account it appears that doubt, unbelief, and pride were the principles which led to this fatal act of disobedience. Eve doubted God's goodness; she disbelieved his threatening; she aspired after forbidden knowledge.

Hodge v 2 p 128


Happenings:

  1. Our Bunn A10 arrived today. It is very industrial looking. I don't think Kathee has fully embraced the logic and wisdom of buying a commercial coffee maker. I'm convinced it will last us at least 10 years! The question is ... will our marriage survive this coffee maker (joking!)
  2. I am working from home tomorrow and brought my laptop home. For some reason, I cannot get the wireless working on the laptop, but I bought a 50' blue LAN cable so I can relax in my recliner and work. The 50' blue LAN cable is another thing that my wife has not fully embraced the logic and wisdom of!
  3. Roger (son) is up at Brother's (another Roger) for dinner. I think Nathan is having dinner there too.
  4. Work: Our latest workstation upgrade job is back in Engineering.
  5. Co-worker Mike brought in his new black MacBook. He installed a product called Parallels and has Windows XP SP 2 running as a virtual machine on his MacBook. Very cool. But ... when I get a MacBook I will have SUSE Linux (or some other LINUX) running on the virtual machine. Countdown to October! (Will my wife see the logic and wisdom of this?)

5.23.2007

The Serpent


Michelangelo - Genesis

It may be inferred from the narrative, that Adam was present with Eve during the temptation. In Gen. iii. 6, it is said the woman gave of the fruit of the tree to her husband who was “with her.” He was therefore a party to the whole transaction. When it is said that a serpent addressed Eve, we are bound to take the words in their literal sense. The serpent is neither a figurative designation of Satan; nor did Satan assume the form of a serpent. A real serpent was the agent of the temptation, as it is plain from what is said of the natural characteristics of the serpent in the first verse of the chapter, and from the curse pronounced upon the animal itself, and the enmity which was declared should subsist between it and man through all time. But that Satan was the real tempter, and that he used the serpent merely as his organ or instrument, is evident, —

  1. From the nature of the transaction. What is here attributed to the serpent far transcends the power of any irrational creature. The serpent maybe the most subtile of all the beasts of the field, but he has not the high intellectual faculties which the tempter here displays.
  2. In the New Testament it is both directly asserted, and in various forms assumed, that Satan seduced our first parents into sin. In Rev. xii. 9, it is said, “The great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world.” And in xx. 2, “He laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan.” In 2 Cor. xi. 3, Paul says, “I fear lest . . . . as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so also your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.” But that by the serpent he understood Satan, is plain from v. 14, where he speaks of Satan as the great deceiver; and what is said in Rom. xvi. 20, “The God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet,” is in obvious allusion to Gen. iii. 15. In John viii. 44, our Lord calls the devil a murderer from the beginning, and the father of lies, because through him sin and death were introduced into the world. Such was also the faith of the Jewish Church. In the Book of Wisdom ii. 24, it is said, that “Through the envy of Satan came death into the world.” In the later Jewish writings this idea is often presented.
As to the serpent's speaking there is no more difficulty than in the utterance of articulate words from Sinai, or the sounding of a voice from heaven at the baptism of our Lord, or in the speaking of Balaam's ass. The words uttered were produced by the power of Satan, and of such effects produced by angelic beings good and evil there are numerous instances in the Bible.



West-metro police report: Vandalism at 4th Baptist

Property damage. Six windows and six doors were broken at Fourth Baptist Church, 900 N. Forestview Lane. The damage was estimated at $10,000.

Comment from Kathee: "If the windows of a Mosque were broken out, the Star Tribune would call it a hate crime!"



Happenings:

  1. Quit a bit of storm damage in our neighborhood ... trees down. All my trees fine! Large tree at the firehouse was snapped off at the base. Neighbor across and 1 lot up had their front tree snapped off at the base (I was commenting to Kathee just 2 days ago about how nicely shaped their tree was!)
  2. Paul, our neighbor across the street who was at his home when the storm hit, told Kathee that the yards were white with hail. Our bushes look beaten down!
  3. Kathee and I finished Ruth (it's only 4 chapters so an EZ read). What a blessed book!
  4. Work: We had upgrade activity to upgrade 10,000 workstations. We had problems and had to stop activity. I am hosting a mtg tomorrow to debrief and resolve.
  5. Allstate: Claim status still unresolved.
  6. Impala: Still at dealership. Wrong part was shipped. Correct part on the way. Not a big deal as we are driving Rachel's car to work.
  7. Rachel emailed from Paris to say she arrived safely
  8. I am shopping for a new work cell phone. Am going to have Son provide some advice tonight.



Key verses from Ruth

1:16,17, Ruth said:

“ Entreat me not to leave you,
Or to turn back from following after you;
For wherever you go, I will go;
And wherever you lodge, I will lodge;
Your people shall be my people,
And your God, my God.

Where you die, I will die,
And there will I be buried.
The LORD do so to me, and more also,
If anything but death parts you and me.”

3:11, And now, my daughter, do not fear. I will do for you all that you request, for all the people of my town know that you are a virtuous woman.

4:13-21 So Boaz took Ruth and she became his wife; and when he went in to her, the LORD gave her conception, and she bore a son. Then the women said to Naomi, “Blessed be the LORD, who has not left you this day without a close relative; and may his name be famous in Israel! And may he be to you a restorer of life and a nourisher of your old age; for your daughter-in-law, who loves you, who is better to you than seven sons, has borne him.” Then Naomi took the child and laid him on her bosom, and became a nurse to him. Also the neighbor women gave him a name, saying, “There is a son born to Naomi.” And they called his name Obed. He is the father of Jesse, the father of David. Now this is the genealogy of Perez: Perez begot Hezron; Hezron begot Ram, and Ram begot Amminadab; Amminadab begot Nahshon, and Nahshon begot Salmon; Salmon begot Boaz, and Boaz begot Obed; Obed begot Jesse, and Jesse begot David.

Question: Who is this Person? "may his name be famous in Israel!" (4:14)

Answer: Read it here!