Showing posts with label Value Investing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Value Investing. Show all posts

7.07.2017

Euphoria Investing?



Investors are nearing the ‘point of maximum financial risk,’ says this chart

Excerpt:

If you’re looking for warning signs in this market, you don’t have to look too far. The Fed winds are no longer at our backs, equity valuations are getting increasingly stretched, and the political climate isn’t exactly stable, to name just a few. Yet, investors continue to feast on a steady diet of new highs, with the Dow continuing to break into uncharted territory even as tech stocks come under pressure. Not a huge surprise, really. As Bob Farrell, the Merrill Lynch investing legend, once said about stock-market trends: “The public buys the most at the top and the least at the bottom.” It remains to be seen if the market is anywhere near a top, of course, but if this chart, which Steve Blumenthal of CMG Capital described as an illustration of Farrell’s views, is any indication, we are approaching the “point of maximum financial risk.”
Comment: The issue is looking for value. Today I bought shares of XEL.  Image source above is from the above article



12.09.2016

Jim's Investing Continuum



Let’s Be Honest: Are You an Investor or a Speculator?

Excerpt:

With the stock market seemingly setting all-time highs every day even as bond prices crumple, this is a crucial time to clarify the difference between investing and speculating.

Unfortunately, that distinction — often credited to the great investment analyst Benjamin Graham — has never been entirely clear.

Every asset is an investment in some people’s hands and a speculation in others’. So it isn’t what you buy, but rather why you buy, that determines whether you are investing or speculating. In his classic 1934 book “Security Analysis” and again in “The Intelligent Investor” (1949), Graham wrote: “An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis, promises safety of principal and a satisfactory [or ‘adequate’] return. Operations not meeting these requirements are speculative.”

I used to regard that description as definitive, but I began to see its flaws a few years ago. Can any analysis ever be thorough enough to “promise” safety or a positive return?

The traditional view, dating back at least to the 19th century, is that an investor buys to capture a predictable long-term stream of cash flow, while a speculator buys to harvest a short-term change in price.
Comment: Click on the image above for larger. On the right is Mark Wahlberg from The Gambler . On the left is the Speculator. In the middle is the planter who patiently waits. Several have asked about my own investing strategies. Here goes:

  • Basically the speculator is the gambler but the gambler may just not care.
  • I try to "treat every nickel like a manhole cover"
  • I don't pay an investment advisor so right there I am saving myself 1% (or more). And I figure that I could be an investment advisor and I care more about my assets than another.
  • About "my assets" - they really are The Lord's. All came from Him - I must glorify Him. A practical outcome of this is that I do not hoard and I do not invest in companies such as tobacco stocks (although their returns are attractive as in MO or BTI)
  • The aforementioned The Intelligent Investor by Benjamin Graham is the definitive read.
  • I do not Day Trade. Never have. I doubt I could make $$ doing it. I regard it as gambling
  • I rarely trade any stock short term 
  • I don't trade Options. I've thought about it and have investigated it but have not and doubt I ever will.
  • If I don't understand what I am buying I pass on the investment
  • I research the company sufficiently to know something about it. I have many examples but here is just one. We think Cracker Barrel is a great restaurant and we have stock in it. 
  • I explain it and "sell" the investment to my wife. She has to agree.
  • It has to, there are exceptions such as BRK-B, pay a dividend.
  • I have to have some confidence that the equity will continue to pay a dividend.
  • Diversification: No one stock dominates. Although we are heavy into several stocks such as ED, JNJ, MMM, and KMB
  • I don't need to beat another investor. I'm not in a contest with another
  • I hope to have a combination of dividends + some growth. I'm happy with 5%
  • I am not looking for spectacular returns - sounds like speculate
  • I buy and hold
  • I try to live humbly (I have a 10 year old car with just about 100,000 m and a 15 year old truck)

1.20.2016

In this dismal market - are there still stocks to buy?



The market sell off that many anticipated has arrived and we are likely in for a rough ride for 2016. I am convinced that value investing is still a valid investing option. I look for companies that:
  • Have a product or products that consumers will buy!
  • Are earning income
  • Have a solid track record even in difficult times.
  • Have low or moderate P/E scores
  • And pay a dividend
Here are a handful and why I like them:
Image source. My own philosophy is to buy a stock that one can hold onto through market swings. If that company can be profitable and will distribute a dividend through tough days, it is a valuable investment. 

7.08.2014

Merrill Lynch: 10 Value Stocks for 2014

Merrill Lynch Picks 10 Value Stocks to Buy for the Rest of 2014



Comment: Image source: The Gold Dirt Company - stock shares on Ebay. My take on above: First of all I like articles like this! Free investment advice. On the specifics:

  • Citigroup: Not convinced the management can make it happen. Were I to invest in a bank it would be USB, WFC, JPM.
  • COF: I have enough bank stocks so not for me now. Also low yield.
  • ESV: Had never heard of the company until today. Completely off my radar! Nice  yield. 
  • Easton: Have a position in but feel it is towards top. Holding. This was the big "inversion" story two years ago
  • Fifth Third: A special place in my heart for this stock as I bought very low at nearly $ 1 (1000 shares) and sold at $ 14. Got me started in self-directed investing. I have enough bank stocks
  • General Dynamics: I have a position. Feel it is high
  • General Motors: Not impressed with the product. Some companies are not retail (GD) but ones that are I ask myself ... "do I like the product". I'm not the most discriminating buyer but if I don't like it I don't like the stock. P/E is high.
  • Hess: Has been on my radar but not high on buy list. Problem = low yield. See The Quest for Yield
  • Noble: I literally know nothing of this company and so off radar so far. 
  • Wells Fargo: I have a position. We may have too much because Wells matches our 401K contributions with stock. We typically divest of this stock annually to maintain a diverse portfolio.

6.25.2012

"Hot Potato" investing - the antithesis of value investing

Is the Buy & Hold Stock Strategy Officially Dead

Excerpts:
If you hold onto an investment for longer than five days, consider yourself the new millennium's version of Benjamin Graham.

The average holding period for the S&P 500 SPDR (SPY), the ETF which tracks the benchmark for U.S. stocks, is less than five days, according to shocking statistics in analyst Alan Newman's latest Crosscurrents newsletter.

"Given recent average volume, the SPY trades its entire capitalization and then some each and every week," wrote the always-provocative analyst. "Does anyone really wish to argue where valuation might enter the picture in this scenario? Value does not matter in the slightest."

Analysts blame the hot potato market on the disappearance of the individual investor and the entry of the high-frequency trader. After three bear markets in the last decade, individual investors - especially baby boomers careening toward retirement - don't have the risk tolerance to be burned once again.

"True liquidity has not come back and the pros and high frequency traders rule the world," said Brian Stutland of Stutland Volatility Group. "Plus, if the average person ever comes back, then they won't have time to play all day long back and forth in the market. So, maybe buy and hold really is dead."

Newman notes in his newsletter that the average holding period for all stocks was almost four years from 1926 through 1999. After a tech mania, a housing bubble, and the explosion in electronic trading, the average holding period sits at just 3.2 months today.
Comment:  I'm a "buy and hold" guy. I subscribe to Benjamin Graham's value investing model. I eschew stocks that I don't intend to keep at least (but probably more like 3) 1 year