Reality Check: Medicare for all is a socialist’s dream

Medicare for all is a socialist’s dream — and an American Nightmare

Excerpt:

we know exactly what Medicare for All would look like.

First, it would be unfair. Forty-four million Americans paid for their Medicare benefits by contributing for 40 years or more into the Medicare Trust. The rest of the American public did not contribute their fair share, so why should they be given for free what others paid dearly for?

Second, even in its present form, Medicare isn’t sustainable. The Congressional Research Service reports the Medicare Trust Fund will be insolvent in less than 10 years. When that happens, Medicare will be broke and seniors will not get the care they need. Why would anyone want to extend the problem of no-care to everyone?

Maybe when candidates such as Ocasio-Cortez promote Medicare-for-All, they’re looking for a system where the government provides health insurance to all for no charge. But wait! We already have such a system. It’s called Medicaid. Maybe supporters of Medicare-for-All are really advocating Medicaid-for-All.

Medicaid is a failure. Because mandates from Washington dictate how the states spend their money, states are not in control of the largest single item in their budgets. And because Medicaid spending comes first, other state priorities must accept the leftovers. Worst of all, Medicaid provides inadequate access to care and instead of making people healthy, Medicaid has caused unnecessary suffering and even death.

Let’s face it, Medicare-for-All is really code for government controlled, single-payer healthcare. After all, England and Canada appear to have successful single-payer systems. Why shouldn’t it work here? 

It all depends on how you define success. The British and the Canadians pay a very high cost for their systems, and not only in monetary terms. Single-payer health care systems take away individual choice, they discourage life-saving research and innovations, and they exchange quality of care for a balanced budget

And there are heart-breaking cases such as Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard — babies in Great Britain who were left to die at the behest of the government. In the National Health Service, the government has the final say in all medical decisions — not patients or their families.

Americans, even those who respond favorably to polls about a vague Medicare-for-All system, would never stand for that.

There is death-by-queueing in single payer systems, where sick persons die from treatable conditions because they could not get care in time and succumb “waiting in line” for care. You don’t even have to go outside the U.S. to see these avoidable deaths. In our own single payer or Medicare-for-All system, the VA, “307,000 veterans may have died waiting for medical care.” 

Medicare-for-All, aka government-controlled healthcare, is precisely what we don’t want. It will either deny us the care we need or land our nation in bankruptcy court. Most people thought the cost of Obamacare, $1.34 trillion, was excessive, but that’s peanuts compared to the $18 trillion price tag for Bernie Sanders’ — and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s — Medicare-for-All.

Instead of government-controlled, insurance-dominated healthcare, we need to return to our roots, to what made our country great: the free market. In 2017, the U.S. spent $3.4 trillion on healthcare for 323 million Americans, or $10,526 for every man, woman and child. Imagine if every family of four put $42,105 in an HSA every year! and simply shopped for and paid for their health care. No government stealing our money to pay its bureaucracy. No insurance company delaying or denying care. Just the old but right doctor-patient relationship with no one and nothing in between.

Comment: We are on Medicare. Fact ... if you don't have Medicare supplement plan, your out of pocket would sink you!

Study: 'Medicare for all' projected to cost $32.6 trillion https://t.co/tT8iRoTx15

— James Peet (@jrpeet) July 30, 2018

'Medicare for All' proposal splits Minnesota Democrats https://t.co/jB9vCCbghz

— James Peet (@jrpeet) July 30, 2018

Contrarian view:

https://t.co/ipEoaOEA6L

— James Peet (@jrpeet) July 30, 2018

Another view:

Liberals will try to discredit this estimate by impugning Mercatus’ sources of funding, but their peg—$32 trillion over ten years—aligns precisely with the nonpartisan Urban Institute’s 2016 estimate: $32 trillion. https://t.co/dXS1uyGgHp https://t.co/6hSR5Gmy9Q

— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) July 30, 2018

Alexandria Ocasio Cortez gives jumbled word salad when asked about her plans for Congress https://t.co/o4OdmwliNk pic.twitter.com/UkFxSlj8cz

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) October 6, 2018

‘Medicare for All’: The Impossible Dream https://t.co/lngr5P9wFp

— James Peet (@jrpeet) March 5, 2019

Congress’s budget gnomes tip-toe around single-payer’s reality. https://t.co/lthMNNFt7s via @WSJ

JP: CBO walks through “key design components and considerations” in a report that aims to bore and deploys the word “could” 209 times.

— James Peet (@jrpeet) May 5, 2019